Visualising numerals as colours and in patterns

EVER SINCE I was able to count, I have visualised numerals as colour.

In my mind:

1 is black

2 is light blue

3 is green

4 is reddish

5 is brown

6 is yellow

7 is dark blue

8 is light green

9 is dark green

10 is black,

and beyond that, I can no longer visualise numerals as coloured. Mention, for example 3, and in my mind’s eye, I see a green figure 3.

In addition to their colouration, I can see in my mind a pattern between 1 and 12 .

A number pattern as visualised by Francis Galton

For many years, I believed that I was alone in imagining numbers as being coloured. However, this changed when I became a student at University College London, and began browsing the shelves of its many splendid libraries. I came across books by Francis Galton (1822-1911) in which he described exactly what goes through my mind when I think about the numerals.

In the scientific journal Nature (Jan 15, 1880), Galton published a paper “Visualised Numbers”, in which he described in detail the phenomenon that I had hitherto believed was unique to me. According to his research about one man in thirty, and one woman in fifteen can visualise numerals. He wrote:

Persons who are imaginative almost invariably think of numerals in visual imagerv. If the idea of six occurs to them, the word “six,” does not sound in their mental ear, but the figure 6 in a written or printed form rises before their mental eye. The clearness of the images of numerals, and the number of them that can be mentally viewed at the same time, differs greatly in different persons.”

As for the numerals appearing in colour, he described the following example:

One of the sisters sees … the figures themselves are coloured, (1) black, (2) white, (3) yellow, (4) red, (5) greenish yellow, (6) blue, (7) black, (8) red, (9) grey. (0) gold. The other sister has a fainter, but still a decided tendency to see figures in a mental diagram. It is without colour but has variations of shade.”

Of the spatial patterning that people including me experience when visualising numerals, Galton said the following:

Nearly all of my correspondents speak with confidence of their forms having been in existence as far back as they recollect. One states that he knows he possessed it at the age of four; another, that he learnt his multiplication table by the aid of the elaborate mental diagram he still uses. Not one in ten is able to suggest any clue as to their origin. They cannot be due to anything written or printed, because they do not simulate what is found in ordinary writings or books.”

What I began by describing at the start of this essay and that which Galton described in his article are examples of what is known as ‘synaesthesia’ (in USA: ;’synesthesia’). A reliable-looking article in Wikipedia defined this as:

“… a perceptual phenomenon in which stimulation of one sensory or cognitive pathway leads to involuntary experiences in other sensory or cognitive pathways.”

It added:

In one of the most common forms of synesthesia, individual letters of the alphabet and numbers (collectively referred to as “graphemes”) are “shaded” or “tinged” with a color. While different individuals usually do not report the same colors for all letters and numbers, studies with large numbers of synesthetes find some commonalities across letters (e.g., A is likely to be red).

On number forms or patterns, the article revealed:

A number form is a mental map of numbers that automatically and involuntarily appears whenever someone who experiences number-forms synesthesia thinks of numbers. These numbers might appear in different locations and the mapping changes and varies between individuals. Number forms were first documented and named in 1881 by Francis Galton

From what I have read, and that which I have quoted, I am not, as I first imagined, alone in experiencing numbers as patterns and colours.

Finally, relating to the above, I found the following on the Tate Gallery website (https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/s/synaesthesia) :

People with synaesthesia tend to be drawn towards the creative arts and some artists have explored the concept in their works, like the Russian abstract artist Wassily Kandinsky, who had an interest in visualising music in his paintings. In the film ‘Sensorium Tests’ which explores mirror-touch synaesthesia, the contemporary artist Daria Martin challenges the idea that the act of looking is a passive experience.

And in case this is of any relevance, I have been quite creative during my life. As a teenager, I drew and painted, and then later I spent several years engraving and etching, and more recently, I began writing.

I wonder

I wonder whether today’s parents would take more interest in their youn goffspring in buggies if they did not possess mobile telephones.

I wonder whether babies and young kids now in buggies will suffer later in life because their parents preferred paying attention to their mobile phones rather than their little children.

Departure angst

Take off_240

 

Ever since I can remember, I have always enjoyed travelling.

Yet, as long as I can recall, I have always experienced  nervousness for a few days before my departure. When I was a child and even in my twenties, I used to feel positively nauseous during the last few hours before setting off. Nowadays, I still feel anxious a few days before leaving on a trip, but I no longer have that sensation of nausea.

The cause of my anxiety is probably a mixture of concern that all will go according to plan and excitement at the prospect of travelling and new experiences.

Whatever the reason for my pre-travel ‘neurosis’, the problem evaporates once I set off on my travels.

Am I alone in this needless worry before departure, or do others feel the same way?

Drama at the theatre

stage

 

In the past, I preferred watching films (‘movies’) to attending live drama at the theatre. Now, my preferences have reversed. In live theatre there is an interraction between the actors on stage and the audience. Good actors engage the audience  psychologically and almost physically. And, I suspect that the actors are also engaged by the audience – its attentiveness, its reactions (facial and otherwise), and other signs of the audience’s feelings provoked by their actions. So great is that interaction between performers and the audience that often I leave the theatre at the end of a performance feeling physically exhausted. Even with superb cinema productions, I never feel as gripped by the performance as I do whilst watching live theatre.

Having stated the above, I am now going to be a bit critical. I have watched many live performances of drama on stage, much of which was excellent. However, I have noticed that in some plays, the first (opening) act is often very weak compared with what follows later. On several occasions, I have walked out of the theatre because a play’s first act or first half has been unpromising. This is sad because now I know that many plays improve as they progress.

I cannot understand why so many plays have weak opening scenes. If I were reading a book and the first 10 or 20% of its pages did not capture my attention, I would abandon the idea of reading it through to its end. Why do so many people remain in the theatre when the opening act is unpromising? Is it because they have paid so much for the tickets? Or, is it because they, like me, have realised that most plays take time to build up to an engaging/enjoyable momentum?

Recently, I saw a play “Amsterdam” by Mayur Arad Yasur at the Orange Tree Theatre at Richmond (SW London). From its first moment, neither the actors nor the play were able to engage me. The same seemed to be the case for several other members of the audience, who walked across the stage and out of the auditorium within a few minutes of the play’s beginning.

Mercifully, about half way through the performance, which did nothing to make me forget the discomfort caused by my seat – it did the opposite, there was a technical hitch. The performance was paused, and some member of the theatre staff mumbled something, which I imagine was to notify us of the hitch. After almost 10 minutes during which no further information was given to the by now restive audience, I decided to follow the actors backstage to find out what was going on. Only then, did someone come out on to the stage to give some information. As what we had already seen of the play had been so unbearable and there seemed to be no sign that the performance would be resumed in the near future, we walked out. Had the play been more enjoyable or in some way worthwhile, we would have waited for it to continue.

Well, you cannot win every time. For each disaster such as “Amsterdam”, we have have seen plenty of highly satisfactory plays.